The Lower East Side Galleries differ immensely from the Chelsea Art Galleries. Personally, I liked the Chelsea galleries better than the Lower East Side. I saw Joe Sheftel, Reena Spaulings, and Miguel Abreu's gallery.
In the Joe Sheftel gallery I saw an installation titled "Deep Space". This piece was to show the psychological effects of built space and how structure affects our emotional state. I think many curators from the Chelsea galleries wouldn't be interested in this piece because its not like the art works they are used to; however it is unique and as a deep meaning to it. Another installation work I saw was "As it Lays" from the Reena Spaulings gallery. This piece featured two chairs,two couches, a t.v, and a main setup. It looked like a talk show set, especially with the main stage. I actually liked this piece, I thought it was unique although it was simple, there was nothing crazy to it. The last piece I picked was "After Troy" from Miguel Abreu's gallery. This installation has three pieces, which are abstract art works representing the human body. With this piece I don't dislike it but I'm not too fond of it either. I think the choice of abstract art to represent the body was an interesting choice, and I do think that a curator from a Chelsea gallery would be interested in this piece.
In conclusion, some pieces I saw were fit for a curators taste while others weren't even fit for my taste. I think there is no yes or no answer to would a curator chose or keep one of the LES pieces because each person is different, they have a different perspective and opinion.
"Deep Space"
"After Troy"
"As it Lays"







